|
The
relationship between the Board of Directors, the Executive Director/Office
Manager and the Coaching Director is one of the most difficult to understand
and manage effectively in youth soccer.
A
Coaching Director or Director of Coaching (DOC) is hired by the Board of
Directors and/or the Executive Director to meet defined technical need of
the association – the development of players and coaches within the
organization – and must meet the requirement for the position as defined by
the United States Soccer Federation. In most cases the DOC has more
coaching education and coaching experience than any board or staff member.
This
sets up a classic confrontation that must be avoided and/or carefully
managed. The confrontation is between the real desires of the board or
Executive Director to set policies over matters that they are less
experienced in than the DOC and the real desire of the DOC to insure that
the policies are valid in the context of US Soccer and US Youth Soccer
coaching policies and practices and in the best interest for the development
of the coaches and players.
As
stated above for the Executive Director, in a non-profit organization,
boards primarily govern and staff primarily manages. It is incumbent on the
DOC to ensure that the board is given full and complete information on
current coaching and developmental theories and practices to allow them to
formulate programs and policies that are appropriate for the audience –
players, coaches, etc. Each party in this relationship needs to understand
its own responsibilities and those that fall in the other's purview, and the
way in which the board and technical staff conduct their business needs to
reflect this understanding. Clear expectations for the board and the
coaching director need to be established and maintained, because a board
that is overly active in management can inhibit the organization's
effectiveness.
Ultimately, the ideas and actions of the Coaching Director, perhaps more
than the will of the board, will influence the nature of player and coach
development programs in the association. The Coaching Director must help
determine which issues the board will address and to assemble the
information that shapes the discussion, this individual can guide the board
towards a true developmental.
The
following are three specific methods that the Coaching Director can take to
help the board govern more and manage less:
Use a
comprehensive strategic development plan that has been developed in
conjunction with the board, and supplement it with regular progress reports.
This can be a useful tool for the board as it develops its own annual work
plans, and will keep the board's sights focused on the long term development
goals and mission of the organization. Regular reports based on this plan
will keep board members apprised of progress toward organizational goals,
and provide part of the basis for evaluation of the coaching director.
Provide the board and executive director with relevant materials before
board meetings, and explain why the materials are coming to the attention of
the board. Let board members know how specific agenda items relate to the
organization's larger mission, and what kind of action or discussion is
desired of the board on each item.
Provide the board with relevant materials regarding all phases of player
development and coaching education including information provided by US
Soccer and US Youth Soccer. Let board members know what other state
associations, the regions and the national organizations are doing to
enhance player development and coaching education. Being an effective
coaching director requires a constant commitment to continuing education,
the same is true for a board of directors and Executive Directors.
Facilitate board and board committee discussions so that the board stays
focused on the larger issues. Refer to set policies that define the limits
of the board's decision-making power, and strive to engage the board in a
dialogue among themselves that leads to consensus-building.
Chain
of Command – who the Coaching Director reports directly to differ from state
to state. In some cases the DOC reports to the Executive Director who may
or may not have a technical background. In other states, the DOC reports
directly to the President or another board member or committee. These may
or not have a technical background as well. In all cases, it is prudent for
the DOC to refer to Items 1 through 3 above to insure that his direct
superior is fully informed and aware of the issues the DOC is dealing with
and is able to evaluate the DOC’s performance and activities. |